During the past eleven years that we have been writing
this newsletter, we have often written about and answered inquiries
concerning credit agreements vs credit applications and the significance of
the credit agreement. It is becoming more apparent that the implementation
of a credit agreement either in lieu of the credit application or as a
supplement to it will be a major contributing factoring the future if the
credit department is to continue its role in collecting from the
buyer within or a reasonable time thereafter.
Since the establishment of
credit, it has always been the seller who determined its’ terms of sale and
other conditions by which goods and services were provided to the buyer
under credit terms. In many countries, laws have been enacted to protect
both the buyer and seller. In the U.S. these laws are contained in Article
Two of the Uniform Commercial Code. With respect to specific terms of sale
the Code has never been forthcoming and specified a particular term, i.e.
30, 60 90. Rather the Code left the specific term to the seller by simply
stating that payment is due upon receipt of goods.
Over the last ten
years the relationship between buyer and seller has evolved to the point
that the buyer has begun dictating to the seller the terms under which they
will purchase the sellers products. This evolution has not only affected the
way business operates today but also the role of the credit department with
emphasis on collections. Never before has collections taken a secondary role
in the management of a businesses cash flow has it has today. The primary
emphasis today is deduction management. And what has changed where we focus
more today on deductions rather than collections?
It used to be that if a
buyer had a dispute with a bill or shipment they would simply notify the
seller and deduct the amount of the dispute from the invoice and pay the
undisputed amount of the invoice when due. This was acceptable because the
buyer was protected during the dispute process by laws like the UCC. Once
notified of the dispute by the buyer, the seller then had the option of how
to handle the dispute and when to resolve it. One law protecting the buyer
was that they could not be penalized for those deductions taken for what
they believed was a legitimate dispute until the seller resolved the issue
and had notified the buyer, in writing, of the outcome of their
investigation of the dispute.
Today, however, the sales agreement has
been replaced with the buyers agreement. This agreement states under what
terms and conditions the buyer agrees to purchase the sellers goods and is
not only different from the sellers sales agreement but also the original
laws established under the Uniform Commercial Code and laws of other
countries with similar wording that provided terms of sale be established by
the seller. Regardless, the buyers’ agreement is a contract and if the
seller ships the order referenced in the buyers agreement then the terms
established by the buyer are valid and enforceable. The credit department is
usually the last to know about the terms whether they be the sellers or
buyers but they become ineffective to enforce their credit terms because
unlike the sellers agreement they are not incorporated into the buyers
agreement.
There is a difference between a sale and a credit sale.
Credit has never been a requirement for a sale. We have, however, over the
years combined the two so that many professionals today are unaware of the
difference. Credit and the ability to obtain it is not based on who the
buyer is, how large the amount of the order, or what the competition is
doing or will do. Credit is based on three simple principles. Character,
Capacity and Capital. Character
is the equivalent of trust and integrity. Capacity is having the ability to
pay and Capital is having the available resources to provide for Capacity.
Credit has its own set of terms that are often different from sales or
buyers terms. But unless there is a written credit agreement those terms
become subordinate to the purchase agreement. The terms of the credit
agreement include when and where payment is due; how disputes are reported
and resolved; information and security; late fees and collection costs;
litigation; the treatment of past due balances and future orders; the limits
imposed on the amount of credit available to the buyer. A well run
organization will require both a sales and credit agreement of its customers
to insure not only the performance of the sales objectives but that the
credit department has the tools in place to meet company and department
goals.
I wish you well.
The information provided above is for
educational purposes only and not provided as legal advice. Legal advice
should be obtained from a licensed attorney in good standing with the Bar
Association and preferably Board Certified in either Creditor Rights or
Bankruptcy.
|